Why firing bad teachers won’t make room for better ones
Bad teachers provide an immense service to this country. You don’t see private industry firing bad workers. The best companies are the ones that have the most bad workers.
My friend Jack Schneider has written some thoughts on education reform in the wake of California’s Treu ruling in June, which held that California’s contract with teachers violates the state’s constitutional guarantee to an equitable education.
Explaining his ruling, Treu wrote that inequities in teaching quality, which disproportionately affect low-income and minority students, “shock the conscience.” And he's right. They do. Yet his ruling will do nothing to solve the problem.
Mr. Schneider is absolutely correct. Making it easier to fire child molesters won’t give us better teachers. These teachers care about their students. Why should we fire teachers who so clearly and physically care about their daily charges? One would think that the architects of such a nurturing environment would be encouraged rather than vilified. To the extent that firing these teachers results in hiring new teachers who care less about students, we will make the classroom a cold, colorless sanctuary of hate.
Even the less flamboyant of the so-called “bad” teachers, those who merely “fail to teach”, are far better at their calling than those society unfairly labels as “good teachers.” One need only look back at one’s own past in the public school systems to see why: there is nothing more exhilarating than overcoming mediocre instruction and succeeding by one’s own merits. By forcing students to self-teach, these “bad” teachers perform the most useful service a teacher can provide: the self-empowerment that comes from succeeding on one’s own.
Finally, think of the unemployment rate! Warehousing bad teachers is the purpose of public schools! The fact of the matter is, it is already easy to fire teachers. Just make their life miserable, and those teachers that are only suitable for the private sector will find another job outside of our government schools and leave of their own accord. This trial by fire ensures that only the most dedicated teachers remain in our schools, those who are such unique instructors they cannot acquire a job anywhere else, and who would otherwise fill the unemployment lines and fall back upon the public weal. Firing bad teachers causes unemployment and wastes our tax money.
Some misguided individuals even go so far as to say that firing bad teachers will free up money to pay good teachers more. Such people do not understand how government programs work. In any government-run program, such as our public schools, any extra money goes toward graft and corruption in the administration. If you support firing bad teachers, you support graft and corruption in our public schools.
In short, the problem is not that we should fire more bad teachers. It is that we should fire more good teachers. That is where the real reform lies.
- Judge Says School Should Not Have Fired Teacher For Calling Kids ‘N*****s’: Eric Owens
- “Joyce Quiller, a former high school math teacher in Jacksonville, Fla., will likely get her job back after she was sacked in February over allegations that she constantly cussed out her students — and unfairly failed nearly 80 percent of them.”
- Making it easier to fire teachers won't get you better ones: Jack Schneider
- “Teachers stall out not because they stop caring but because they lack guidance and support. Engaged in difficult and demanding work, even gifted teachers need relevant, robust and continuous professional development opportunities. But very few get it, particularly in schools serving high-needs students. As a result, most teachers realize only a fraction of their full potential.” Teachers work at least seven hours a day, at least nine months a year. Where would they find the time for professional growth?
- Rubber room’s ‘dirty’ old man: Susan Edelman
- “But the Department of Education can’t fire Pierre, and he’s stuck around long past the minimum retirement age. Pierre was permanently removed from the classroom in 1997 after he was accused of sexually molesting a sixth-grade girl at PS 138 in Brooklyn.”
- A speedier way to fire (some) teachers
- “The issue of how difficult it can be to fire a teacher accused of molestation arose after the 2012 arrest of Mark Berndt, a teacher at Miramonte Elementary School in Los Angeles. Berndt was sentenced to 25 years in prison as a result of lewd acts against dozens of young students, which included feeding them semen from a spoon. The Los Angeles Unified School District moved to fire him shortly after his arrest, but ultimately paid him $40,000 to drop his appeal of the dismissal.”
- Teacher isn’t fired after giving teen gifts, sending ‘love’ texts: Susan Edelman
- “Middle school teacher James Rampulla was found guilty of inappropriate behavior with a student, but was not fired.”
More government schools
- On education, the left is mired in the fifties
- Why don’t schools have locked doors? Because when it comes to education, especially K-12, the left, as in so many things, is mired in the distant industrialized assembly-line past.
- Why is it so difficult to hold schools accountable?
- Simulating accountability in education has the same problems as simulating accountability in health care or any other monopoly. Tests and grades and paperwork are never as effective as choice.
- Anything less than school choice is unfair
- Forcing people to pay for one government school regardless of where they want their kids to go is so unfair that even far-left Democrats think it’s wrong.
- Democrats endorse public school elections, teacher recalls?
- Should legislators and teachers be evaluated for job performance in the same way? A group called Winning Democrats suggests that public school teachers should be elected positions rather than tenured, and that teachers should be subject to recall by the communities they serve.
- What is a captive audience, anyway?
- G.K. Chesterton writes, in Eugenics and Other Evils, that whenever someone starts asking “what is x anyway?” you know they’re trying to pull some wool over your eyes and make it the default. So, really, what is a captive audience, anyway?
- Eight more pages with the topic government schools, and other related pages
More government unions
- White privilege is not the nail
- Attributing George Floyd’s death to white privilege when it was caused by left-run city policy means that we will continue to have more George Floyds.
- Why not support government unions? You support NFL unions!
- Either teachers unions don’t understand the difference between the private and public sectors, or they want to force us to pay for NFL season tickets regardless of whether we watch football.
- What is a captive audience, anyway?
- G.K. Chesterton writes, in Eugenics and Other Evils, that whenever someone starts asking “what is x anyway?” you know they’re trying to pull some wool over your eyes and make it the default. So, really, what is a captive audience, anyway?
- The Union Free Rider and the Orphaned Stalker
- Unions want all workers to date them exclusively, because they care about all workers, and they don’t want those workers seeing other people.
- Fair and open competition—closed and bitter politicians
- The arguments against Proposition A are based on a law that passed less than a month ago, in response to Proposition A. That response is a prime example of why we need to break the chain that locks government unions to politicians.
Jack Schneider is an assistant professor of education at the College of the Holy Cross in Massachusetts and the author of “From the Ivory Tower to the Schoolhouse: How Scholarship Becomes Common Knowledge in Education.” He is a native of Los Angeles. That he works in the professional development community in no way affects his views on this subject.